EGFR Protein Expression Relates with Tumor Histology, Methylation Status of EGFR and HPV16 E6 Viral Load in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is important in tumorigenesis of oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). However, the molecular mechanisms contributing to EGFR expression in OPC are not well-known. To detect relating factors and clinicopathological impact of EGFR protein expression in OPC, gene amplification/loss, point mutations including synonymous mutations, and promoter methylation of EGFR, and the viral genome load of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-E5, -E6, and -E7, after extracting HPV16-related OPCs with qPCR of HPV16-E6 and E7, were investigated in 74 OPC surgical cases, including 52 HPV-related (HPV-OPC) and 22 HPV-unrelated (nHPV-OPC). Immunohistochemical (IHC) data of EGFR expression (high, weak, and negative), validated by the qPCR of EGFR mRNA, were compared with molecular, viral, and clinicopathological data of patients. All nHPV-OPC cases were EGFR-IHC-high, whereas 21.2%, 65.4%, and 13.5% of HPV-OPC cases showed EGFR-IHC-high, -weak, -negative (p < 0.01), respectively. In HPV-OPC cases, EGFR-IHC-weak/negative status was related to promoter methylation of EGFR (p = 0.009), but not with gene amplification/loss or the point mutation of EGFR and was more often seen in HPV16-OPC cases (p = 0.049). Among HPV16-OPC cases, EGFR-IHC-weak/negative was related to high E6 expression. EGFR protein-loss was related to the tumor histology of non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (p = 0.035) but not with patient prognosis. In conclusion, decreased EGFR protein expression was more frequent in HPV-OPC than in nHPV-OPC and was related to EGFR methylation, infection of HPV16, and the viral genome load of HPV16-E6. Clinicopathologically, it was related to the tumor histology of non-keratinizing SCC.

Radiological and Pathological Assessment of the 2017 Revised International Association of Pancreatology Consensus Guidelines for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm, With an Emphasis on the Gastric Pyloric Gland Type.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the pitfalls of the current International Association of Pancreatology guidelines (IAPCG2017) for pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and identify the criteria for future guidelines. METHODS: Eighty surgically resected, consecutive IPMN cases were analyzed. Data including tumor site, IPMN duct type, and surgery type were collected. Based on radiological data, cases were retrospectively classified as high-risk stigmata (HRS) and non-HRS. Pathological grades and histological subtypes of IPMN cases were determined. Severe stromal sclerosis of the IPMN septa/marked parenchymal atrophy in the upstream pancreas was investigated pathologically. Positive/negative predictive values of the IAPCG2017 were calculated. Clinicopathological features of HRS-benign cases (pathologically benign IPMN cases meeting the HRS criteria) were extracted. RESULTS: The positive/negative predictive values were 72.7%/64.0%, 70.0%/34.6%, and 54.0%/63.3% for IAPCG2017, HRS-main pancreatic duct, and HRS-nodule criteria, respectively. The 15 HRS-benign cases (18.8%) included 13 pancreatoduodenectomies and 10 cases of gastric pyloric (GP) gland subtype. Severe upstream atrophy was significantly related to IPMN malignancy, unlike the severe sclerosis of IPMN septa. CONCLUSIONS: Benign IPMNs of GP subtype are sometimes categorized as HRS with the IAPCG2017. Collecting data on the natural course of GP-IPMN is necessary. To evaluate upstream atrophy may be of value to predict IPMN malignancy.